Monday, 21 March 2011

Why don't they link?

A blog entry written as if the author was peering into my brain:

Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? Whether it’s a press release, an academic journal article, a formal report, or perhaps (if everyone’s feeling brave) the full transcript of an interview, the primary source contains more information for interested readers, it shows your working, and it allows people to check whether what you wrote was true. Perhaps linking to primary sources would just be too embarrassing.


because linking sources is such an easy thing to do, and the motivations for avoiding links are so dubious, I’ve detected myself using a new rule of thumb: if you don’t link to primary sources, I just don’t trust you.

[ From "Why don’t journalists link to primary sources?" by Ben Goldacre from Bad Science on March 19th, 2011 ]

No comments: