Speaking for the state, Laurence said the boy's poem cannot be analyzed in a vacuum. The boy passed the poem to a girl in his English class 11 days after a student killed two classmates and wounded 13 others at Santana High School in Santee on March 5, 2001.Of course it can't be analyzed in a vacuum. You have to consider intent and justification [realistically, if not legally] and it makes perfect sense that anyone would be disturbed shortly after such an incident, feel the compulsion to do something about it [like write a poem], and feel the need to share it in an environment like [heavens] an English class. For all I know, the kid could be an evil little bastard but there's a big difference between this situation and the intended reductio ad absurdum example of "a bank robber [being] immune from charges for giving a bank teller this note: 'Roses are red. Violets are blue. Give me the money or I'll shoot you.'"
Wednesday, 23 June 2004
Drop the pen, step away from the pen...
Is violent poetry criminal? California high court debates conviction of teenage boy : Children writing disturbing poetry being convicted of criminal intent. Wasn't there a Law & Order about this? The foolish thing is this :
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment